Dunne v. Commissioner

4 B.T.A. 836, 1926 BTA LEXIS 2208
United States Board of Tax Appeals·Decided September 15, 1926·No. Docket No. 4840.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Arundell

: This is a proceeding for the redetermination of a deficiency in income tax for the calendar year 1922 in the amount of $6,562.03. The error alleged is the action of the Commissioner in including in the income of the petitioner that part of the community income reported by the wife of the petitioner.

[837] The appeal was submitted on the pleadings and the only facts before us are those admitted by the Commissioner in his answer. Of these the only ones material are that the petitioner is married and is a resident of the State of California. These facts are not sufficient to warrant our disturbing the action of the Commissioner.

Judgment for the Commissioner.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dunne v. Commissioner, 4 B.T.A. 836, 1926 BTA LEXIS 2208 (bta 1926).

4 B.T.A. 836 (Dunne v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dunne v. Commissioner
4 B.T.A. 836 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1926)