Dunnavant v. State

665 So. 2d 354, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 13404, 1995 WL 761190
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 28, 1995·No. No. 94-1678·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, appellant, a juvenile at the time the offenses of which he was convicted had been committed, seeks review of adult sentences imposed incident to those convictions. Because the trial court faded to inform appellant of his rights pursuant to section 39.059(7), Florida Statutes (1991), and to ensure on the record that any waiver of those rights was voluntarily and intelligently made, we are constrained to reverse, and to remand for resentencing. State v. Berry, 647 So.2d 830 (Fla.1994). On remand, the trial court may again sentence appellant as an adult, provided that all applicable statutory requirements are satisfied. Troutman v. State, 630 So.2d 528 (Fla.1993).

REVERSED and REMANDED, with directions.

ERVIN, BOOTH and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dunnavant v. State, 665 So. 2d 354, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 13404, 1995 WL 761190 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

665 So. 2d 354 (Dunnavant v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Troutman v. State
630 So. 2d 528 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)
State v. Berry
647 So. 2d 830 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1994)