Dunn v. Tunica-Biloxi Indians
873 So. 2d 14, 2 La.App. 3 Cir. 920, 2003 La. App. LEXIS 1615, 2003 WL 21229472
This text of 873 So. 2d 14 (Dunn v. Tunica-Biloxi Indians) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Dunn v. Tunica-Biloxi Indians, 873 So. 2d 14, 2 La.App. 3 Cir. 920, 2003 La. App. LEXIS 1615, 2003 WL 21229472 (La. Ct. App. 2003).
Opinions
For the reasons expressed in Bonnette v. Tunica-Biloxi Indians d/b/a Paragon Casino Resort, 02-919 (La.App. 3 Cir. 5/28/03), 873 So.2d 1, 2003 WL 21229282, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Costs of this appeal are assessed to Plaintiffs-Appellants.
AFFIRMED.
THIBODEAUX, J., concurs in part and dissents in part with written reasons.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ortego v. TUNICA BILOXI INDIANS OF LA.
865 So. 2d 985 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2004)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
873 So. 2d 14, 2 La.App. 3 Cir. 920, 2003 La. App. LEXIS 1615, 2003 WL 21229472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunn-v-tunica-biloxi-indians-lactapp-2003.