Dunn v. Tunica-Biloxi Indians
873 So. 2d 14, 2 La.App. 3 Cir. 920, 2003 La. App. LEXIS 1615, 2003 WL 21229472
Opinions
For the reasons expressed in Bonnette v. Tunica-Biloxi Indians d/b/a Paragon Casino Resort, 02-919 (La.App. 3 Cir. 5/28/03), 873 So.2d 1, 2003 WL 21229282, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Costs of this appeal are assessed to Plaintiffs-Appellants.
AFFIRMED.
THIBODEAUX, J., concurs in part and dissents in part with written reasons.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dunn v. Tunica-Biloxi Indians, 873 So. 2d 14, 2 La.App. 3 Cir. 920, 2003 La. App. LEXIS 1615, 2003 WL 21229472 (La. Ct. App. 2003).
873 So. 2d 14 (Dunn v. Tunica-Biloxi Indians) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ortego v. TUNICA BILOXI INDIANS OF LA.
865 So. 2d 985 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2004)