Dunn v. State
23 Ohio St. (N.S.) 167
Opinion
When a bill of exceptions refers to an exhibit attached to and made part thereof, only as containing the testimony admitted at the trial, the reviewing court can not consider any statement in said exhibit purporting to recite rulings, admitting or excluding evidence made by the court before which the case was tried.
Motion overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dunn v. State, 23 Ohio St. (N.S.) 167 (Ohio 1872).
23 Ohio St. (N.S.) 167 (Dunn v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.