Dunn v. State

334 S.W.3d 903, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 156, 2011 WL 533675
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 15, 2011
DocketED 94478
StatusPublished

This text of 334 S.W.3d 903 (Dunn v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dunn v. State, 334 S.W.3d 903, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 156, 2011 WL 533675 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Edward T. Dunn appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 1 motion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2010). ■

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2010, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. TORELLO
334 S.W.3d 903 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
334 S.W.3d 903, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 156, 2011 WL 533675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunn-v-state-moctapp-2011.