Dunn v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Dunn v. State

732 S.W.2d 260, 1987 Mo. App. LEXIS 4316

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 30, 1987·No. No. 52332·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Movant appeals from the denial of his second Rule 27.26 motion without an evi-dentiary hearing. The motion challenged his sentence of life imprisonment after having pled guilty to first degree murder.

[261]*261The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact and conclusions of law which are not clearly erroneous. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Movant appeals from the denial of his second Rule 27.26 motion without an evi-dentiary hearing. The motion challenged his sentence of life imprisonment after having pled guilty to first degree murder.

[261]*261The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact and conclusions of law which are not clearly erroneous. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Dunn v. State, 732 S.W.2d 260, 1987 Mo. App. LEXIS 4316 (Mo. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

732 S.W.2d 260 (Dunn v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.