Dunn v. State

238 S.E.2d 77, 239 Ga. 537, 1977 Ga. LEXIS 1238
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 7, 1977
Docket32461
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 238 S.E.2d 77 (Dunn v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dunn v. State, 238 S.E.2d 77, 239 Ga. 537, 1977 Ga. LEXIS 1238 (Ga. 1977).

Opinions

Undercofler, Presiding Justice.

R. R. Dunn was tried and convicted by a jury of discharging a firearm on Sunday not in defense of person or property contrary to Code Ann. § 26-9919a. He challenged the accusation by demurrer on the ground that this, statute is unconstitutional because it violates equal protection. 1976 Const., Art. I, Sec. II, Par. III (Code Ann. § 2-203); Ga. R. Co. v. Wright, 125 Ga. 589 (54 SE 52) (1906). The trial court denied his motion and we affirm.

Code Ann. § 26-9919a provides: "It shall be unlawful for any person to wilfully or wantonly fire or discharge a firearm on Sunday. The provisions of this section shall not apply to (1) persons who shall fire or discharge a firearm in defense of person or property; (2) law enforcement officers; and (3) persons who shall fire or. discharge a firearm at a firing range approved by the sheriff or police chief of the county or municipality in which the firing range is located and which is supervised by law enforcement officers or representatives of a local, State or National gun club.”1 Such legislation is permitted under the police power. Berta v. State, 223 Ga. 267 (154 SE2d 594) (1967). As long as the classifications are reasonable, and we hold that they are, this court will not interfere with the discretion of the General Assembly. Compare Rutledge v. Gaylord’s, Inc., 233 Ga. 694 (213 SE2d 626) (1975); Hughes v. Reynolds, 223 Ga. 727 (157 SE2d 746) (1967).

Submitted June 24, 1977 Decided September 7, 1977. Robert G. Dunn, for appellant. Joe L. Houston, Solicitor, for appellee.

The accusation was sufficient to charge Dunn with a violation of this law. See State v. Eubanks, 239 Ga. 483 (1977).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Jordan, Hill and Bowles, JJ., who dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davis v. State
286 S.E.2d 430 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1982)
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Five Transportation Co.
271 S.E.2d 844 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1980)
Cannon v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance
241 S.E.2d 238 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
238 S.E.2d 77, 239 Ga. 537, 1977 Ga. LEXIS 1238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunn-v-state-ga-1977.