Dunn v. State

577 So. 2d 692, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3815, 1991 WL 46829
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 9, 1991·No. No. 90-02214·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal from the summary denial of appellant’s motion for postconviction relief under Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Appellant asserts that: (1) he was denied effective assistance of counsel; (2) his plea was not freely and voluntarily entered, as he was under the influence of medication at the time he entered his plea; and (3) the trial erred m refusing to allow him to withdraw his plea prior to sentencing.

The trial court summarily denied the motion but failed to attach those portions of the record which support the grounds for denial. See Stinyard v. State, 476 So.2d 277 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985), and Vann v. State, 561 So.2d 21 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). We therefore reverse and remand the trial court’s order for proceedings consistent herewith.

BOOTH, SMITH and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dunn v. State, 577 So. 2d 692, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3815, 1991 WL 46829 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

577 So. 2d 692 (Dunn v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stinyard v. State
476 So. 2d 277 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Vann v. State
561 So. 2d 21 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)