Dunn v. Scollay

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Dunn v. Scollay

1 Super. Ct. Jud. 187

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedAugust 15, 1765

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Super. Ct. Jud. 187 (Dunn v. Scollay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dunn v. Scollay, 1 Super. Ct. Jud. 187 (Mass. 1765).

Pincite

Opinion

AUTHORITIES in Favour of the Plaintiff were, Molloy (old Edit.) 205, § 10, 212, § 14, 213, § 14; Molloy (new Edit. 1744) 358, [188]*188237-8, 244-5; 2 Raymond, 931; Ld. Holt’s Opinion relied on; Sea Laws, 128.

1765.

In Favour of the Defendant were, 2 Chancery Cases, 239; 1 Salk. 35; 3 Bacon, 592, 595. (²)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

AUTHORITIES in Favour of the Plaintiff were, Molloy (old Edit.) 205, § 10, 212, § 14, 213, § 14; Molloy (new Edit. 1744) 358, [188]*188237-8, 244-5; 2 Raymond, 931; Ld. Holt’s Opinion relied on; Sea Laws, 128.

1765.

In Favour of the Defendant were, 2 Chancery Cases, 239; 1 Salk. 35; 3 Bacon, 592, 595. (²)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Super. Ct. Jud. 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunn-v-scollay-mass-1765.