Dunn v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

239 A.D. 866

This text of 239 A.D. 866 (Dunn v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dunn v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America, 239 A.D. 866 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

Judgment, in so far as it allows recovery on the $800 policy, set forth in the fourth cause of action, reversed, on the law, and such cause of action dismissed, with costs to the respondent against the appellant, on the ground that there was no evidence of a visible wound or contusion; in all other respects the judgment and order are affirmed. Hill, P. J., Rhodes and Crapser, JJ., concur; Bliss, J., concurs in the reversal as to the recovery on the $800 policy, set forth in the fourth paragraph of the complaint, and votes to reverse and dismiss as to the recoveries had in the other four causes of action.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
239 A.D. 866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunn-v-prudential-insurance-co-of-america-nyappdiv-1933.