Dunn v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
This text of 239 A.D. 866 (Dunn v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment, in so far as it allows recovery on the $800 policy, set forth in the fourth cause of action, reversed, on the law, and such cause of action dismissed, with costs to the respondent against the appellant, on the ground that there was no evidence of a visible wound or contusion; in all other respects the judgment and order are affirmed. Hill, P. J., Rhodes and Crapser, JJ., concur; Bliss, J., concurs in the reversal as to the recovery on the $800 policy, set forth in the fourth paragraph of the complaint, and votes to reverse and dismiss as to the recoveries had in the other four causes of action.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
239 A.D. 866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunn-v-prudential-insurance-co-of-america-nyappdiv-1933.