Dunn v. O'Connor

104 Misc. 426
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1918
StatusPublished

This text of 104 Misc. 426 (Dunn v. O'Connor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dunn v. O'Connor, 104 Misc. 426 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1918).

Opinion

Philbin, J.

The motion to serve a supplemental complaint is granted. The original complaint in this foreclosure suit sets forth a default in the payment of taxes on the mortgaged property and that pursuant to the terms of the mortgage the plaintiff elects to consider the principal immediately due and payable. The plaintiff now asks leave to set up a default in the payment of interest, alleged to have occurred after this action had been begun, and which also gave the plaintiff, pursuant to the mortgage, the right to declare the principal due. The new matter thus sought to be set up is in aid of an existing cause of action and does not call for any greater or other relief than was originally demanded. Cohn v. Husson, 5 Civ. Pro. 324, 326; Merrihew v. Kingsbury, 150 App. Div. 40. Plaintiff [427]*427to serve a supplemental complaint setting up the default in the payment of interest within five days after service of notice of entry of this order. Date of issue remains the same and cause retains its present place on the calendar.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Merrihew v. Kingsbury
150 A.D. 40 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
104 Misc. 426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunn-v-oconnor-nysupct-1918.