Dunn v. Moody

41 Me. 239
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided July 1, 1856·Published

Opinion

Tenney, C. J.

The instructions of the Judge were favorable to the defendant. Those requested and refused, had been given substantially before to the jury.

It does not appear from the report of the evidence, that the jury were under any improper influence, or failed to understand the testimony.

Exceptions and motion overruled.

Goodenow, Rice, Hathaway and Cutting, J. J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dunn v. Moody, 41 Me. 239 (Me. 1856).

41 Me. 239 (Dunn v. Moody) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.