Dunn v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
This text of 233 A.D. 761 (Dunn v. Metropolitan Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order of the City Court of Yonkers reversed upon the law and the facts, with costs, motion to set aside verdict granted and complaint dismissed, with costs. The undisputed evidence is that the insured was not in sound health at the time of the issuance of the policy; that he had, within two years before its issuance, been attended by a physician for a serious disease, and that before the issuance of the policy the insured suffered from a chronic disease the absence of which, as is specified in the policy, was a condition of its validity. (Cirrincioni v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 223 App. Div. 461; Rudolph v. John Hancock M. L. [762]*762Ins. Co., 251 N. Y. 208.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Cars-well, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
233 A.D. 761, 250 N.Y.S. 857, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunn-v-metropolitan-life-insurance-nyappdiv-1931.