Dunn v. Mahoning Valley Ry. Co.

89 Ohio St. (N.S.) 449
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 13, 1914
DocketNo. 13693
StatusPublished

This text of 89 Ohio St. (N.S.) 449 (Dunn v. Mahoning Valley Ry. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dunn v. Mahoning Valley Ry. Co., 89 Ohio St. (N.S.) 449 (Ohio 1914).

Opinion

Judgment of the circuit court reversed on grounds stated in journal entry.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said circuit court be, and the same hereby is, reversed; and this court coming now to render such judgment as the circuit court should have rendered, it is ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the common pleas court be, and the same hereby is, reversed and said cause remanded to said common pleas court for a new trial, for the reason that the common pleas court erred in charging the jury that there was no evidence of any negligence on the part of the conductor of the [450]*450street-car in question, and that there could be no recovery against the defendant company upon the ground that he was negligent.

Nichols, C. J., Johnson, Donahue, Wanamaker, Newman and Wilkin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 Ohio St. (N.S.) 449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunn-v-mahoning-valley-ry-co-ohio-1914.