Dunn v. LeBlanc

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Dunn v. LeBlanc

80 A. 1131, 107 Me. 520, 1910 Me. LEXIS 133

DecidedDecember 15, 1910

StatusPublished

This text of 80 A. 1131 (Dunn v. LeBlanc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dunn v. LeBlanc, 80 A. 1131, 107 Me. 520, 1910 Me. LEXIS 133 (Me. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

Action

on the case to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from the plaintiff being struck by an automobile owned by the defendant and driven by his son. Verdict for plaintiff for $400. Defendant filed a general motion for a new trial. The rescript says: "There being in this case a subsisting verdict and a majority of the Justices after mature consideration and consultation not concurring in granting a new trial, the motion in the case is overruled and judgment ordered on the verdict.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action

on the case to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from the plaintiff being struck by an automobile owned by the defendant and driven by his son. Verdict for plaintiff for $400. Defendant filed a general motion for a new trial. The rescript says: "There being in this case a subsisting verdict and a majority of the Justices after mature consideration and consultation not concurring in granting a new trial, the motion in the case is overruled and judgment ordered on the verdict.”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

80 A. 1131, 107 Me. 520, 1910 Me. LEXIS 133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunn-v-leblanc-me-1910.