Dunn v. Lawrence

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Dunn v. Lawrence

118 N.W. 1118, 106 Minn. 541, 1908 Minn. LEXIS 781

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedDecember 18, 1908

DocketNos. 16,007—(129)

StatusPublished

This text of 118 N.W. 1118 (Dunn v. Lawrence) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dunn v. Lawrence, 118 N.W. 1118, 106 Minn. 541, 1908 Minn. LEXIS 781 (Mich. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this case judgment was entered in October, 1906 Information of fraud charged came to the knowledge of plaintiffs, through their counsel, in May or June, 1907. Application was made to open the judgment in March, 1908. The trial court refused to vacate the judgment. It would serve no useful purpose to here state or discuss the details of the facts upon which plaintiffs relied. The matter of opening the judgment was in the sound discretion of the trial court Abuse of that discretion does not appear.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this case judgment was entered in October, 1906 Information of fraud charged came to the knowledge of plaintiffs, through their counsel, in May or June, 1907. Application was made to open the judgment in March, 1908. The trial court refused to vacate the judgment. It would serve no useful purpose to here state or discuss the details of the facts upon which plaintiffs relied. The matter of opening the judgment was in the sound discretion of the trial court Abuse of that discretion does not appear.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

118 N.W. 1118, 106 Minn. 541, 1908 Minn. LEXIS 781, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunn-v-lawrence-minn-1908.