Dunn v. Jordan Concrete

Missouri Court of Appeals

Dunn v. Jordan Concrete

217 S.W.3d 913, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 525, 2007 WL 900758

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 27, 2007·No. No. ED 88633·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dennis Dunn appeals the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying him worker’s, compensation. The order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dennis Dunn appeals the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying him worker’s, compensation. The order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Dunn v. Jordan Concrete, 217 S.W.3d 913, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 525, 2007 WL 900758 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

217 S.W.3d 913 (Dunn v. Jordan Concrete) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.