Dunn v. Jones
This text of 330 S.W.2d 932 (Dunn v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This controversy arises on a motion for appeal from a judgment, based on a jury verdict, settling a boundary dispute. The parties are adjoining property owners, and the judgment confirmed the boundary established by their respective deeds.
Appellants claim title by adverse possession and estoppel. They contend they were entitled to a directed verdict and that the instructions were erroneous.
[933]*933There was a decided conflict in the evidence concerning the nature, extent and duration of the alleged adverse possession of the disputed strip. In our opinion the issues were properly presented to the jury, and we find no basis for disturbing the judgment.
The motion for appeal is denied and the judgment stands affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
330 S.W.2d 932, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunn-v-jones-kyctapp-1959.