Dunn v. Jo Ann Taube Realty, Inc.

399 So. 2d 63, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20030
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 26, 1981·No. No. 80-1882·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In the light of the showing of excusable neglect, and of the proferred meritorious defenses, we find that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the appellant-defendant’s promptly filed motions to set aside the default and final default judgment entered against her below. North Shore Hospital, Inc. v. Barber, 143 So.2d 849 (Fla.1962); McAlice v. Kirsch, 368 So.2d 401 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Espinosa v. Racki, 324 So.2d 105 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Rubin v. Baker, 276 So.2d 532 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973). Accordingly, the order under review is reversed with directions to vacate the default and default judgment and to accept the defendant’s tendered answer, and for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dunn v. Jo Ann Taube Realty, Inc., 399 So. 2d 63, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20030 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

399 So. 2d 63 (Dunn v. Jo Ann Taube Realty, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miami-Dade County v. Coral Bay Section C Homeowners Ass'n
979 So. 2d 318 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Miami-Dade County v. CORAL BAY SECTION C
979 So. 2d 318 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
BC Builders Supply Co., Inc. v. Maldonado
405 So. 2d 1345 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)