Dunn v. Genovese
This text of 166 A.D. 938 (Dunn v. Genovese) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff’s affidavit states that he would prove by defendant that the colliding-automobile was owned and operated by the il plaintiff.’’ Defendant denies ownership and operation, it may be because plaintiff conjoined allegation of such ownership and allegation with a charge of negligent collision with plaintiff. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
166 A.D. 938, 151 N.Y.S. 1113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunn-v-genovese-nyappdiv-1915.