Dunn v. Games
This text of 8 F. Cas. 101 (Dunn v. Games) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
And
directed that the defendants should pay the assessment of the jury aforesaid, to the lessors of the plaintiff, within six months; and, in default thereof, that the writ of possession may issue.
A motion was then made that the costs 'of the inquest be taxed to the lessors of the plaintiff. But THE COURT held that the costs of this proceeding follow the judgment. Had a judgment been entered agairist the lessors .of the plaintiff for the improvements, as the statute authorizes, the costs of the inquest might have been taxed in that judgment
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 F. Cas. 101, 2 McLean 344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunn-v-games-circtdoh-1840.