Dunn v. Dunn

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dunn v. Dunn

840 So. 2d 350, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2012, 2003 WL 367070

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 21, 2003

DocketNo. 1D02-4747

StatusPublished

This text of 840 So. 2d 350 (Dunn v. Dunn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dunn v. Dunn, 840 So. 2d 350, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2012, 2003 WL 367070 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the appellant’s response to this Court’s order, dated January 2, 2003, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The appellant brought a motion for summary judgment before the trial court, which apparently never entered a written order denying the motion. Then the appellant brought a motion entitled Motion by Robert Dunn for the Court to Provide Him with a Copy of the Filed Signed Written Judgment or Order on His “Motion for Summary Judgment Against Respondent Mona Lisa Kean for Failure to Provide Notice.” The trial court denied this motion in an order entered October 22, 2002. The motion for a copy was in fact a motion to compel the trial court to enter an order on the motion for summary judgment. As such, the order denying the motion for a copy is neither a final order nor a nonfinal order appealable pursuant to Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, 9.130(a)(4), (5) (2002).

DISMISSED.

ALLEN, C.J., BENTON and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the appellant’s response to this Court’s order, dated January 2, 2003, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The appellant brought a motion for summary judgment before the trial court, which apparently never entered a written order denying the motion. Then the appellant brought a motion entitled Motion by Robert Dunn for the Court to Provide Him with a Copy of the Filed Signed Written Judgment or Order on His “Motion for Summary Judgment Against Respondent Mona Lisa Kean for Failure to Provide Notice.” The trial court denied this motion in an order entered October 22, 2002. The motion for a copy was in fact a motion to compel the trial court to enter an order on the motion for summary judgment. As such, the order denying the motion for a copy is neither a final order nor a nonfinal order appealable pursuant to Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, 9.130(a)(4), (5) (2002).

DISMISSED.

ALLEN, C.J., BENTON and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

840 So. 2d 350, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2012, 2003 WL 367070, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunn-v-dunn-fladistctapp-2003.