Dunn v. . Dove

131 S.E. 764, 191 N.C. 824, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 191
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 17, 1926·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Tbe assignment of error chiefly relied upon by plaintiff, on bis appeal to tbis Court, is based upon bis exception to tbe order allowing tbe motion for judgment of nonsuit. Plaintiff admitted upon tbe trial below tbat defendant, Jobn H. Dove, was tbe owner of tbe three lots described in tbe complaint at tbe time tbe sheriff of Lenoir County sold same for taxes, on 3 June, 1924. He claims title under deed executed by tbe sheriff, dated 6 June, 1925. Evidence offered by plaintiff fails to show compliance by him as purchaser at tbe sale with statutory provisions required .to make tbe sheriff’s deed valid. There was no error in allowing tbe motion. Price v. Slagle, 189 N. C., 157.

Tbe other exceptions are without merit. Tbe judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dunn v. . Dove, 131 S.E. 764, 191 N.C. 824, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 191 (N.C. 1926).

131 S.E. 764 (Dunn v. . Dove) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. . Rideout
126 S.E. 500 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1925)