Dunn v. . Dove
This text of 131 S.E. 764 (Dunn v. . Dove) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Tbe assignment of error chiefly relied upon by plaintiff, on bis appeal to tbis Court, is based upon bis exception to tbe order allowing tbe motion for judgment of nonsuit. Plaintiff admitted upon tbe trial below tbat defendant, Jobn H. Dove, was tbe owner of tbe three lots described in tbe complaint at tbe time tbe sheriff of Lenoir County sold same for taxes, on 3 June, 1924. He claims title under deed executed by tbe sheriff, dated 6 June, 1925. Evidence offered by plaintiff fails to show compliance by him as purchaser at tbe sale with statutory provisions required .to make tbe sheriff’s deed valid. There was no error in allowing tbe motion. Price v. Slagle, 189 N. C., 157.
Tbe other exceptions are without merit. Tbe judgment is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
131 S.E. 764, 191 N.C. 824, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunn-v-dove-nc-1926.