Dunn v. Blue Ridge Telephone Co.

Eleventh Circuit

Dunn v. Blue Ridge Telephone Co.

888 F.2d 731, 1989 WL 127592

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided September 28, 1989·No. Nos. 87-8837, 88-8158·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTIONS FOR REHEARING IN BANC

(Opinion April 6, 1989, 11th Cir., 1989, 868 F.2d 1578)

Before RONEY, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK, EDMONDSON, and COX, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing in banc and a majority of the judges of this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing in banc,

IT IS ORDERED that these consolidated cases shall be decided by this court in banc. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of in banc briefs.

The previous panel opinion is hereby VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTIONS FOR REHEARING IN BANC

(Opinion April 6, 1989, 11th Cir., 1989, 868 F.2d 1578)

Before RONEY, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK, EDMONDSON, and COX, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing in banc and a majority of the judges of this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing in banc,

IT IS ORDERED that these consolidated cases shall be decided by this court in banc. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of in banc briefs.

The previous panel opinion is hereby VACATED.

Dunn v. Blue Ridge Telephone Co., 888 F.2d 731, 1989 WL 127592 (11th Cir. 1989).

Pincite

888 F.2d 731 (Dunn v. Blue Ridge Telephone Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related