Dunn v. Blue Ridge Telephone Co.

Eleventh Circuit

Dunn v. Blue Ridge Telephone Co.

888 F.2d 731, 1989 WL 127592

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedSeptember 28, 1989

DocketNos. 87-8837, 88-8158

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 888 F.2d 731 (Dunn v. Blue Ridge Telephone Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dunn v. Blue Ridge Telephone Co., 888 F.2d 731, 1989 WL 127592 (11th Cir. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTIONS FOR REHEARING IN BANC

(Opinion April 6, 1989, 11th Cir., 1989, 868 F.2d 1578)

Before RONEY, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK, EDMONDSON, and COX, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing in banc and a majority of the judges of this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing in banc,

IT IS ORDERED that these consolidated cases shall be decided by this court in banc. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of in banc briefs.

The previous panel opinion is hereby VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI