Dunn v. Bates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dunn v. Bates

51 A.D.2d 1032, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11828

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 22, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 51 A.D.2d 1032 (Dunn v. Bates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dunn v. Bates, 51 A.D.2d 1032, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11828 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by appellant to amend the decision and resettle the order of this court, both dated November 3, 1975. Cross motion by petitioner-respondent to punish appellant for contempt of this court’s order. Motion granted to the extent of amending the decretal paragraph of the decision, so as to insert therein a provision for payment by the appellant of the rent arrearage directly to the petitioner’s former landlord in Westchester County, for the account of the petitioner, and in satisfaction of the judgment for such arrearage against her, as is consented to in petitioner’s papers on the cross motion. Order dated November 3, 1975 amended accordingly. Cross motion denied. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Margett and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by appellant to amend the decision and resettle the order of this court, both dated November 3, 1975. Cross motion by petitioner-respondent to punish appellant for contempt of this court’s order. Motion granted to the extent of amending the decretal paragraph of the decision, so as to insert therein a provision for payment by the appellant of the rent arrearage directly to the petitioner’s former landlord in Westchester County, for the account of the petitioner, and in satisfaction of the judgment for such arrearage against her, as is consented to in petitioner’s papers on the cross motion. Order dated November 3, 1975 amended accordingly. Cross motion denied. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Margett and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 A.D.2d 1032, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11828, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunn-v-bates-nyappdiv-1976.