Dunn, Robert Terrance

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 4, 2014
DocketWR-80,127-02
StatusPublished

This text of Dunn, Robert Terrance (Dunn, Robert Terrance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dunn, Robert Terrance, (Tex. 2014).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS




NO. WR-80,127-02




EX PARTE ROBERT TERRANCE DUNN, Applicant





ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1114177 IN THE 262ND DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY




            Per curiam.


O P I N I O N


            Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of indecency with a child and sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment. The Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Dunn v. State, No. 14-08-00442-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Jun. 2, 2009) (unpublished).

            Applicant contends that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel did not timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed and failed to advise him of his right to petition pro se for discretionary review. We remanded this application to the trial court for additional findings of fact and conclusions of law.

            Appellate counsel filed an affidavit with the trial court and, after remand, mail logs from the Texas Department of Criminal Justice and the Harris County Jail were submitted. The trial court has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law that appellate counsel did not comply with Rule of Appellate Procedure 48.4 and Applicant did not receive notice that his conviction had been affirmed. The trial court recommends that relief be granted. Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).

            We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionary review of the judgment of the Fourteenth Court of Appeals in Cause No. 14-08-00442-CR that affirmed his conviction in Cause No. 1114177 from the 262nd District Court of Harris County. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionary review with this Court within 30 days of the date on which this Court’s mandate issues.

            Applicant’s remaining claims are dismissed. Ex parte Torres, 943 S.W.2d 469 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).

Delivered: June 4, 2014

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Wilson
956 S.W.2d 25 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1997)
Ex Parte Torres
943 S.W.2d 469 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1997)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Dunn, Robert Terrance, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunn-robert-terrance-texcrimapp-2014.