Dunn, Ex Parte
This text of 63 N.C. 137 (Dunn, Ex Parte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
When a widow files a petition for a year’s provisions, under the statute, and dies before any allotment is made, the administrator has no right to revive the petition, but it is abated. Cox, v. Brown, 5 Ire. 194.
Before such allotment, she has no inter est transmissible to her administrator. Kimball v. Deming, 5 Ire. 418.
What amounts to an allotm ent ?
It is contended here, that the acts of the Commissioners, appointed by the County Court to allot and set apart a year’s support for the petitioner, constituted such an allotment.
We cannot think so.
Their acts were only a part of the proceedings, necessary to obtain a year’s provisions. The petitioner died before the’ report was returned to Court. Upon the return of the report it was open to exception, and might have been set aside. The: allotment is not complete until the report is confirmed by the Court. There is no error.
PER Cubiam. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
63 N.C. 137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunn-ex-parte-nc-1869.