Dunn Appraisal Co. v. Passidomo

105 A.D.2d 839, 481 N.Y.S.2d 761, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20960

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Commissioner of the Department of Motor Vehicles, which, after a hearing, (1) found that petitioner had violated section 398-e (subd 1, par [k]) of the Vehicle and Traffic Law by engaging in a course of conduct which unreasonably impeded or delayed a consumer’s right to a fair recovery on a damage claim and (2) imposed a $250 civil penalty.

Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, with costs.

The determination under review was supported by substantial evidence in the record (see Matter of Hannon v Cuomo, 52 NY2d 775; 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176). Boyers, J. P., Rubin, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dunn Appraisal Co. v. Passidomo, 105 A.D.2d 839, 481 N.Y.S.2d 761, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20960 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

105 A.D.2d 839 (Dunn Appraisal Co. v. Passidomo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human Rights
379 N.E.2d 1183 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)
Hannon v. Cuomo
417 N.E.2d 1005 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)