Dunlop v. Munroe

1 D.C. 536
CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedJune 15, 1809
StatusPublished

This text of 1 D.C. 536 (Dunlop v. Munroe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dunlop v. Munroe, 1 D.C. 536 (D.D.C. 1809).

Opinion

The Court

(Duckett, J., absent,)

said it was not a matter of common right to poll the jury, and they would not fix a precedent by which either party might capriciously insist on polling the jury without assigning any reason therefor.

Fitzhugh, J.,

added, that the want of practice is strong evidence

of the want of right. An extraordinary case should be made out to justify a departure from the ordinary course of proceeding.

Verdict for the defendant upon all the issues.

(Affirmed by the Supreme Court of United States, 7 Cranch, 242.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dunlop v. Munroe
11 U.S. 242 (Supreme Court, 1812)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 D.C. 536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunlop-v-munroe-dcd-1809.