Dunlop v. Allegheny County Institution District

401 F. Supp. 501, 13 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1185, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15704, 10 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 10,545
CourtDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 17, 1975
DocketCiv. A. No. 74-1153
StatusPublished

This text of 401 F. Supp. 501 (Dunlop v. Allegheny County Institution District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dunlop v. Allegheny County Institution District, 401 F. Supp. 501, 13 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1185, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15704, 10 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 10,545 (W.D. Pa. 1975).

Opinion

OPINION AND ORDER

MARSH, District Judge.

This case arises under the Equal Pay Act of 1963, 29 U.S.C. § 206(d)(1)1 which added to § 6 of the Fair Labor [502]*502Standards Act of 1938 the principle of equal pay for equal work regardless of sex. It is our opinion that the action should be dismissed because the wage differential between three male barbers licensed by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and three female beauticians licensed by the Commonwealth, all employed by the defendant hospital, was based on factors other than sex; principally the neutral factor of hiring members of two distinct licensed professions, trained by different type schooling, and whose jobs require unequal skill, effort and responsibility. The professional differential itself, we believe is excepted under the catchall exception (iv) as “a differential based on any other factor than sex.” 2

It is established that the Secretary bears the burden of proving equality of work and unequal pay; if he sustains that burden the defendant employer has the burden of proving that the criterion for discrimination was some factor other than sex. Corning Glass Works v. Brennan, 417 U.S. 188, 195-196, 94 S.Ct. 2223, 41 L.Ed.2d 1 (1974); Shultz v. Wheaton Glass Co., 421 F.2d 259, 266 (3rd Cir. 1970).

In our opinion the Secretary failed to sustain his burden; but even if it is found that he did, the defendant employer proved that the principal criteria for pay discrimination between licensed barbers and licensed beauticians was attributable to the obvious difference in special training and, at the hospital, in dissimilar skills, efforts and responsibilities of these separate and distinct professions. These variants are factors other than sex.3 Accordingly, fixing wages for these different professions is a separate function performed by the County Salary Board. (Tr. 97-98).4

The following facts have been stipulated by the parties or found from the evidence.

This action was instituted by the Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, under the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended (29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.), hereinafter referred to as the Act. The plaintiff has alleged that the defendant has violated section 6(d) of the Act by paying its female beauticians at lower rates than it paid its male barbers for the performance of work which required equal skill, effort and responsibility and which was performed under similar working conditions. (Tr. 3-4).

Plaintiff seeks the restraint of continued violations of the Act and further seeks to have the defendant restrained from withholding any back wages owed to its employees as a result of the aforesaid alleged violations. (Tr. 4).

The defendant, Allegheny County Institution District, maintains an office at Room 101 Allegheny County Courthouse, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. (Tr. 4).

John J. Kane Hospital is a geriatric hospital operated by the Allegheny County Institution District, a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. (Tr. 7). The hospital is located on Vanadium Road, Scott Township, Pennsylvania.

Defendant at all times relevant hereto has employed in excess of 2,000 employees. A significant, but undetermined number of employees are regularly and recurringly engaged in interstate [503]*503commerce or in the production of goods for commerce. More specifically, defendant’s employees receive, handle or otherwise work on medical and surgical equipment, drugs, foodstuffs, maintenance equipment and supplies, furniture and like items which have been received from points outside of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Defendant’s office employees are engaged in the receipt, preparation, and forwarding of letters, bills, invoices and like documents to or from points directly outside the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. (Tr. 4-5).

Defendant is an enterprise engaged in commerce within the meaning of section 3(s)(4) of the Amendments to the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1966, (29 U.S.C. 203(s)(4)). (Tr. 5).

Plaintiff claims the difference between wages received by certain barbers employed by defendant and those wages received by Ann K. DeBone, Margaret Magliocca and Beatrice Adams from December 6,1971 to the present time.

There are approximately 1,300 female patients at the hospital.5

All beauticians work from 7:30 a. m. to 3:30 p. m. Monday through Friday. (Tr. 53). The work of the beauticians is divided between the floors in the women’s sections of the hospital and the beauty shop. Between 50% and 75% is spent cutting hair and the remaining time is spent in the beauty shop. (DXF). (Tr. 60, 116, 127). The beauticians are required to wear a uniform purchased with their own funds. (Tr. 53-54).

The female beauticians are engaged in basic hair care for female patients. (Tr. 5).

All the female beauticians are licensed by the Pennsylvania Bureau of Professional Licensing. (Tr. 5).

There are approximately 700 male patients at the hospital.6 (Tr. 5).

All the male barbers work from 8:00 а. m. to 4:00 p. m. Monday through Friday. (Tr. 13, 25). Usually in the morning, the barbers work on the floors of the hospital in the men’s sections; in the afternoon one barber works in the barber shop while the other two work on the floors of the hospital. The barbers wear aprons provided by the hospital. (Tr. 26).

The barbers are engaged in basic hair care for the male patients. (Tr. 5).

All the barbers are licensed by the Pennsylvania Bureau of Licensing. (Tr. 5).

The average patient age at the hospital is 76.5 years. (Tr. 7-8).

The barbers and beauticians work as separate and distinct groups; there is no interchangeability between them; and there is no realistic common supervision. (Tr. 52, 102-103). Mr. Magliocca, the working supervisor, supervises only to the extent of seeing that the time sheets are filled in and for processing complaints. He admitted his inability to supervise the work product of the beauticians. (Tr. 103-104). He does not tell the barbers how to perform their work. (Tr. 11). He does not receive extra pay.

Beauticians and barbers are scheduled to work pursuant to the collective bargaining agreement between the County of Allegheny and Service Employees International Union. AFL-CIO-CLC. (Tr. 6-7).

The tools used by barbers are scissors, thinning shears, combs, a clipper, a trimming clipper and neck duster. The barbers carry their tools to the floors in a kit. (Tr. 15-16, 27).

The tools used by beauticians are scissors, thinning shears, combs, brushes, various chemical lotions, oils and creams, clippers, bobby pins, clips, irons, rollers and electric razors. They keep a hair dryer and heater in the beauty [504]*504shop. The beauticians convey their tools to the floors on a cart. (Tr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Corning Glass Works v. Brennan
417 U.S. 188 (Supreme Court, 1974)
Shultz v. Wheaton Glass Co.
421 F.2d 259 (Third Circuit, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
401 F. Supp. 501, 13 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1185, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15704, 10 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 10,545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunlop-v-allegheny-county-institution-district-pawd-1975.