Dunlevy v. Ross

Ohio Supreme Court

Dunlevy v. Ross

1 Wright 287, 1 Ohio Ch. 287

DecidedJune 15, 1833

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Wright 287 (Dunlevy v. Ross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dunlevy v. Ross, 1 Wright 287, 1 Ohio Ch. 287 (Ohio 1833).

Pincite

Opinion

BY THE COURT.

The statute (29 O. L. 74) makes a return of two nihils in this class of cases equal to service; and provides that the defendant shall thereafter be considered in court, and be proceeded against accordingly. No formal or technical appearance is necessary, after the second nihil; the law holds the defendant in court, and if he do answer, or plead, he may be defaulted. The defendant was then called, and failed to answer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BY THE COURT.

The statute (29 O. L. 74) makes a return of two nihils in this class of cases equal to service; and provides that the defendant shall thereafter be considered in court, and be proceeded against accordingly. No formal or technical appearance is necessary, after the second nihil; the law holds the defendant in court, and if he do answer, or plead, he may be defaulted. The defendant was then called, and failed to answer.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Wright 287, 1 Ohio Ch. 287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunlevy-v-ross-ohio-1833.