Dunleavy v. Tietjen & Lang Dry Docks
This text of 90 A.2d 84 (Dunleavy v. Tietjen & Lang Dry Docks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
EDWARD DUNLEAVY, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
TIETJEN & LANG DRY DOCKS, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Before Judges JAYNE, COLIE and GRIMSHAW.
Mr. Patrick F. McDevitt argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Reich & McDevitt, attorneys).
Mr. Walter H. Jones argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Walter R. Hespe, of counsel on the brief).
The opinion of the court was delivered PER CURIAM.
The judgment under review is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Drewen reported in 17 N.J. Super. 76 (Cty. Ct. 1951).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
90 A.2d 84, 20 N.J. Super. 486, 1952 N.J. Super. LEXIS 906, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunleavy-v-tietjen-lang-dry-docks-njsuperctappdiv-1952.