Dunleavy v. Tietjen & Lang Dry Docks

90 A.2d 84, 20 N.J. Super. 486, 1952 N.J. Super. LEXIS 906
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division·Decided July 9, 1952·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

20 N.J. Super. 486 (1952)
90 A.2d 84

EDWARD DUNLEAVY, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
TIETJEN & LANG DRY DOCKS, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued July 7, 1952.
Decided July 9, 1952.

Before Judges JAYNE, COLIE and GRIMSHAW.

Mr. Patrick F. McDevitt argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Reich & McDevitt, attorneys).

Mr. Walter H. Jones argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Walter R. Hespe, of counsel on the brief).

The opinion of the court was delivered PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Drewen reported in 17 N.J. Super. 76 (Cty. Ct. 1951).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dunleavy v. Tietjen & Lang Dry Docks, 90 A.2d 84, 20 N.J. Super. 486, 1952 N.J. Super. LEXIS 906 (N.J. Ct. App. 1952).

90 A.2d 84 (Dunleavy v. Tietjen & Lang Dry Docks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Arcell v. Ashland Chemical Co., Inc.
378 A.2d 53 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1977)
Kelly v. RTC Shipbuilding Corp.
209 A.2d 340 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1965)
Gaddies v. Trenton Marine Terminal, Inc.
206 A.2d 180 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1965)
Clyde Flowers v. The Travelers Insurance Company
258 F.2d 220 (Fifth Circuit, 1958)
Green v. Simpson & Brown Const. Co.
94 A.2d 693 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1953)