Dunlap v. Superior Court of the City of San Berbardino
This text of Dunlap v. Superior Court of the City of San Berbardino (Dunlap v. Superior Court of the City of San Berbardino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DEC 1 7 20"!
Clerk. U.S. District 8. Bankru tc FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Courtstorthe District of amiable
Jermaine J. Dunlap, ) Plaintiff, ) V. ) Civil Action No. 14-1699 (UNA) Superior Court 3 of the City of San Bemardino et al., ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION
Plaintiff is a California state prisoner who has submitted yet another document comprised of incoherent statements and inexplicable attachments. “Similar to the plaintiff’ s prior actions, this action is difficult to comprehend.” Dunlap v. Dep ’t of Review Board, No. 14-0145, 2014 WL 414156 (D.D.C. Jan. 30, 2014), citing Dunlap v. Board of Prison Hearings, N0. 1:08-cv- 1770, 2009 WL 1759651, at *3 (ED. Cal. Jun. 22, 2009) (dismissing amended habeas petition presenting “the same incomprehensible allegations [stated] on three separate [prior] occasions”). The document initiating this action presents no discernible facts to state a claim. Hence, this case will be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. See Dunlap, 2014 WL 414156 (same). A separate Order accompanies this
Memorandum Opinion.
Date: December ,2014
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dunlap v. Superior Court of the City of San Berbardino, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunlap-v-superior-court-of-the-city-of-san-berbard-dcd-2014.