Dunlap v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Dunlap v. State

33 So. 2d 385, 33 Ala. App. 356, 1948 Ala. App. LEXIS 475

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 19, 1948

Docket6 Div. 322.

StatusPublished

This text of 33 So. 2d 385 (Dunlap v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dunlap v. State, 33 So. 2d 385, 33 Ala. App. 356, 1948 Ala. App. LEXIS 475 (Ala. Ct. App. 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

CARR, Judge.

This appeal is here on the record without a transcription of the evidence or the oral charge of the court. In this state of the record we are without authority to review the action of the trial judge in refusing to appellant several written instructions. Chapman v. State, 249 Ala. 30, 29 So.2d 286; Rikard v. State, 31 Ala.App. 374, 18 So.2d 435.

There appearing no errors, we order the judgment of the lower court affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CARR, Judge.

This appeal is here on the record without a transcription of the evidence or the oral charge of the court. In this state of the record we are without authority to review the action of the trial judge in refusing to appellant several written instructions. Chapman v. State, 249 Ala. 30, 29 So.2d 286; Rikard v. State, 31 Ala.App. 374, 18 So.2d 435.

There appearing no errors, we order the judgment of the lower court affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 So. 2d 385, 33 Ala. App. 356, 1948 Ala. App. LEXIS 475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunlap-v-state-alactapp-1948.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack