Dunlap v. State
33 So. 2d 385, 33 Ala. App. 356, 1948 Ala. App. LEXIS 475
Opinion
This appeal is here on the record without a transcription of the evidence or the oral charge of the court. In this state of the record we are without authority to review the action of the trial judge in refusing to appellant several written instructions. Chapman v. State, 249 Ala. 30, 29 So.2d 286; Rikard v. State, 31 Ala.App. 374, 18 So.2d 435.
There appearing no errors, we order the judgment of the lower court affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dunlap v. State, 33 So. 2d 385, 33 Ala. App. 356, 1948 Ala. App. LEXIS 475 (Ala. Ct. App. 1948).
33 So. 2d 385 (Dunlap v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rikard v. State
18 So. 2d 435 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1944)
Chapman v. State
29 So. 2d 286 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1947)