Dunlap v. Moose
This text of 135 S.W. 824 (Dunlap v. Moose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
(after stating the facts). The action of unlawful detainer is only to decide the right to the immediate possession of lands and tenements, and not to determine the right or title of the parties to or in them. A tenant cannot dispute the title of his landlord while he remains in .possession under him, nor acquire possession from the landlord by lease and then dispute his title, but must first surrender possession and bring his action. Washington v. Moore, 84 Ark. 220.
The portion of the defendant’s answer stricken out might have been, if true, a defense to an action of 'ejectment for the lands, and he is not precluded by judgment against him in unlawful detainer for the possession from setting up such facts in a proper suit, if they constitute a cause of action. The court committed no error in striking out that portion of the answer. The paragraph of the answer not stricken out put in issue the right to the possession, and appellant conceded plaintiff’s right to recover thereon, under the facts.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
135 S.W. 824, 98 Ark. 235, 1911 Ark. LEXIS 92, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunlap-v-moose-ark-1911.