Dunlap v. Jones
This text of 4 Ind. 641 (Dunlap v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Jones sued Dunlap in covenant. The declaration sets forth a contract sealed by the parties, whereby Dunlap, in consideration of 200 dollars, agreed with Jones to construct for him a dwelling-house, in a workmanlike manner. The payment of the money is averred and certain breaches specifically assigned. Plea, performance, with an agreement that all special matter should be admissible under it. The cause was submitted to the Court by consent. The Court found for the plaintiff below. Motion for a new trial overruled. Judgment on the finding of the Court.
Whether the proof was sufficient to sustain the finding of the Court is the only question presented by the record.
The judgment, where the cause is tried by the Court “ can be set aside only on the same preponderance of [642]*642evidence that would invalidate a verdict.” 4 Blackf. 311.—5 id. 108.—6 id. 507. But the record does not profess to set out all the evidence given on the trial. Therefore its insufficiency to support the judgment cannot be assigned for error. 5 Blackf. 146.—8 id. 196. However, from what is set out, the right of Jones to recover is sufficiently shown.
The judgment is affirmed, with 10 per cent, damages and costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 Ind. 641, 1853 Ind. LEXIS 265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunlap-v-jones-ind-1853.