Dunlap v. G & L Holding Group, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dunlap v. G & L Holding Group, Inc.

932 So. 2d 566, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 10733, 2006 WL 1763677

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 29, 2006

DocketNo. 1D06-2058

StatusPublished

This text of 932 So. 2d 566 (Dunlap v. G & L Holding Group, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dunlap v. G & L Holding Group, Inc., 932 So. 2d 566, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 10733, 2006 WL 1763677 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the two motions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, served on April 27, 2006, as well as the appellants’ response, filed on May 15, 2006, the motions are hereby GRANTED. The Court finds that the order on appeal is not an appealable final order. Dedge v. Crosby, 914 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (holding order granting motion to dismiss with prejudice is not a final appealable order). See also, Massachusetts Life Ins. Co. v. Crapo, 918 So.2d 393, 394 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (providing test to determine whether order is appealable as a partial final judgment). Accordingly, this appeal is hereby dismissed without prejudice to appellants’ [567]*567right to file a timely notice of appeal once an appealable order is rendered.

WOLF, PADOVANO, and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the two motions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, served on April 27, 2006, as well as the appellants’ response, filed on May 15, 2006, the motions are hereby GRANTED. The Court finds that the order on appeal is not an appealable final order. Dedge v. Crosby, 914 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (holding order granting motion to dismiss with prejudice is not a final appealable order). See also, Massachusetts Life Ins. Co. v. Crapo, 918 So.2d 393, 394 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (providing test to determine whether order is appealable as a partial final judgment). Accordingly, this appeal is hereby dismissed without prejudice to appellants’ [567]*567right to file a timely notice of appeal once an appealable order is rendered.

WOLF, PADOVANO, and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

932 So. 2d 566, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 10733, 2006 WL 1763677, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunlap-v-g-l-holding-group-inc-fladistctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack