Dunlap v. Dunlap
1 Wright 210, 1 Ohio Ch. 210
Opinion
The decisions have been uniform, that you must allege in the bill the person with whom the offence of adultery was committed, if known, and if unknown, the want of knowledge must be set forth as an excuse for omitting the name. The proof must conform to the allegations.
Leave was given to amend, and the cause was continued.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dunlap v. Dunlap, 1 Wright 210, 1 Ohio Ch. 210 (Ohio 1833).
1 Wright 210 (Dunlap v. Dunlap) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.