Dunlap v. Crown Drug Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Dunlap v. Crown Drug Co.

348 P.2d 609, 186 Kan. 5, 1960 Kan. LEXIS 239

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Dunlap v. Crown Drug Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 185 Kan. 494 →

Supreme Court of Kansas·Decided January 23, 1960·No. No. 41,456·Published

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Robb, J.:

The third paragraph at page 498 of the opinion in Dunlap v. Crown Drug Co., 185 Kan. 494, 345 P. 2d 657, is stricken, and in lieu thereof the following is substituted:

“Claimant is entitled to $82.00 per week for 110.86 compensable weeks amounting to a total sum of $3,547.20 of which $717.70 has already been paid, leaving a balance of $2,829.49 which should be paid her in a lump sum.

Otherwise, petitions for rehearing are denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Robb, J.:

The third paragraph at page 498 of the opinion in Dunlap v. Crown Drug Co., 185 Kan. 494, 345 P. 2d 657, is stricken, and in lieu thereof the following is substituted:

“Claimant is entitled to $82.00 per week for 110.86 compensable weeks amounting to a total sum of $3,547.20 of which $717.70 has already been paid, leaving a balance of $2,829.49 which should be paid her in a lump sum.

Otherwise, petitions for rehearing are denied.

Dunlap v. Crown Drug Co., 348 P.2d 609, 186 Kan. 5, 1960 Kan. LEXIS 239 (kan 1960).

Pincite

348 P.2d 609 (Dunlap v. Crown Drug Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related