Dunlap v. Chenoweth
106 A. 890, 90 N.J. Eq. 601, 5 Stock. 601, 1919 N.J. LEXIS 254
Opinion
The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes.
[602]*602For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kaliscit, Black, White, HepPENHEIMER, WILLIAMS, TAYLOR, GARDNER — 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dunlap v. Chenoweth, 106 A. 890, 90 N.J. Eq. 601, 5 Stock. 601, 1919 N.J. LEXIS 254 (N.J. 1919).
106 A. 890 (Dunlap v. Chenoweth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ditmars v. Camden Trust Co.
76 A.2d 280 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)