Dunlap v. Chenoweth

106 A. 890, 90 N.J. Eq. 601, 5 Stock. 601, 1919 N.J. LEXIS 254
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMay 8, 1919
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 106 A. 890 (Dunlap v. Chenoweth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dunlap v. Chenoweth, 106 A. 890, 90 N.J. Eq. 601, 5 Stock. 601, 1919 N.J. LEXIS 254 (N.J. 1919).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes.

[602]*602For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kaliscit, Black, White, HepPENHEIMER, WILLIAMS, TAYLOR, GARDNER — 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ditmars v. Camden Trust Co.
76 A.2d 280 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
106 A. 890, 90 N.J. Eq. 601, 5 Stock. 601, 1919 N.J. LEXIS 254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunlap-v-chenoweth-nj-1919.