Dunlap

61 A. 704, 100 Me. 397, 1905 Me. LEXIS 64
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedJuly 7, 1905
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 61 A. 704 (Dunlap) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dunlap, 61 A. 704, 100 Me. 397, 1905 Me. LEXIS 64 (Me. 1905).

Opinion

Strout, J.

This is a petition of Charles F. Dunlap, grandfather of Erlon M. Dunlap, a minor of the age of twelve years, for the appointment of the grandfather as guardian of the minor, with the care and custody of his person. The Judge of Probate granted the prayer of the petition, and the appellants, his parents, appealed from the decree of the Probate Court. In the Supreme Court of Probate after full hearing had before a Justice of this Court, who found the facts, he affirmed the decree of the Probate Court, and the case is here upon exceptions.

In cases of this kind the welfare of the child is the main and controlling consideration. The determination of this question is in the first instance submitted to the Probate Court, and ultimately, if an appeal is taken, to the determination of a Justice of this Court sitting as Judge of the Supreme Court of Probate. The statute imposes upon such justice the duty of hearing and deciding the fact, whether the welfare of the child requires such guardianship. Such decision is to be arrived at by the exercise of the sound judgment and discretion of the Justice hearing the case. His decision is not a ruling of law, but his judgment of the facts and necessity and propriety of his conclusions. It is not subject to exception. In this case the Justice determined that the welfare of the minor demanded his removal from the influences surrounding him while in the custody of his parents, and that they were incompetent to discharge their duty in that regard. We cannot reverse that finding upon exceptions. The entry must be

Exceptions dismissed. Decree below affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hogan
194 A. 854 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
61 A. 704, 100 Me. 397, 1905 Me. LEXIS 64, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunlap-me-1905.