Dunks v. Grey
3 F. 862, 5 Ban. & A. 634, 1880 U.S. App. LEXIS 2583
Opinion
The court is of opinion that the exceptions should be dismissed and the master’s report confirmed, but will not issue the attachment if the respondent will obtain from his son, and file in court, an agreement to refrain from hereafter manufacturing or selling the articles which infringe complainant’s patents.
Subsequently such an agreement was executed by the son, with the consent of the Boston principal, Mr. Ladd, and was filed by respondent. The court ordered that respondent pay the master’s fee, the other costs to abide the final result of the cause.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dunks v. Grey, 3 F. 862, 5 Ban. & A. 634, 1880 U.S. App. LEXIS 2583 (uscirct 1880).
3 F. 862 (Dunks v. Grey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
County of Becker v. County of Hennepin
99 N.W.2d 444 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1959)
In Re Determining Settlement for Poor-Relief Purposes of Sonnenberg
256 Minn. 571 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1959)
City of Minneapolis v. Town of Orono
2 N.W.2d 149 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1942)
In Re Settlement of Horton
2 N.W.2d 149 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1942)
Lufkin v. Harvey
154 N.W. 1097 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1915)