Home/U.S. Circuit Court/Dunks v. Grey

Dunks v. Grey

3 F. 862, 5 Ban. & A. 634, 1880 U.S. App. LEXIS 2583
CourtUnited States Circuit Court
DecidedSeptember 14, 1880
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 3 F. 862 (Dunks v. Grey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dunks v. Grey, 3 F. 862, 5 Ban. & A. 634, 1880 U.S. App. LEXIS 2583 (uscirct 1880).

Opinion

Butube, D. J.

The court is of opinion that the exceptions should be dismissed and the master’s report confirmed, but will not issue the attachment if the respondent will obtain from his son, and file in court, an agreement to refrain from hereafter manufacturing or selling the articles which infringe complainant’s patents.

Subsequently such an agreement was executed by the son, with the consent of the Boston principal, Mr. Ladd, and was filed by respondent. The court ordered that respondent pay the master’s fee, the other costs to abide the final result of the cause.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

County of Becker v. County of Hennepin
99 N.W.2d 444 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1959)
In Re Determining Settlement for Poor-Relief Purposes of Sonnenberg
256 Minn. 571 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1959)
City of Minneapolis v. Town of Orono
2 N.W.2d 149 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1942)
In Re Settlement of Horton
2 N.W.2d 149 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1942)
Lufkin v. Harvey
154 N.W. 1097 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 F. 862, 5 Ban. & A. 634, 1880 U.S. App. LEXIS 2583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunks-v-grey-uscirct-1880.