Dunkley v. State
This text of 138 So. 3d 486 (Dunkley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant, Korzan Dunkley a/k/a Korian Dunkley, timely appeals the denial of a petition for writ of habeas corpus. Appellant has filed successive post-conviction challenges to his sentence and untimely challenges to his convictions. The claims raised in this appeal are without merit. See Clark v. State, 72 So.3d 222 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011); Mann v. State, 851 So.2d 901 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); Swain v. State, 744 So.2d 474 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); Robinson v. State, 393 So.2d 33, 34 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). Appellant is cautioned that filing of frivolous pleadings may result in the sanction of no longer accepting his pro se filings and may result in referral to the Department of Corrections for disciplinary procedures. See § 944.279, Fla. Stat. (2013); State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
138 So. 3d 486, 2014 WL 1373752, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunkley-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.