Dunkley v. Shoemate
485 S.E.2d 295, 346 N.C. 274, 1997 N.C. LEXIS 306
Opinion
The interlocutory order of the superior court, from which the plaintiff appealed, affects a substantial right which the plaintiff will lose if the order is not reviewed before final judgment. Waters v. Qualified Personnel, Inc., 294 N.C. 200, 240 S.E.2d 338 (1977); Highway Commission v. Nuckles, 271 N.C. 1, 155 S.E.2d 772 (1967). It was error to dismiss the appeal. We reverse the order dismissing the appeal and remand to the Court of Appeals for a hearing on the merits.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dunkley v. Shoemate, 485 S.E.2d 295, 346 N.C. 274, 1997 N.C. LEXIS 306 (N.C. 1997).
485 S.E.2d 295 (Dunkley v. Shoemate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dunkley v. Shoemate
515 S.E.2d 442 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1999)
Dunkley v. Shoemate
497 S.E.2d 713 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1998)