Dunkley v. Shoemate

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Dunkley v. Shoemate

485 S.E.2d 295, 346 N.C. 274, 1997 N.C. LEXIS 306

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedJune 6, 1997

Docket28PA97

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 485 S.E.2d 295 (Dunkley v. Shoemate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dunkley v. Shoemate, 485 S.E.2d 295, 346 N.C. 274, 1997 N.C. LEXIS 306 (N.C. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The interlocutory order of the superior court, from which the plaintiff appealed, affects a substantial right which the plaintiff will lose if the order is not reviewed before final judgment. Waters v. Qualified Personnel, Inc., 294 N.C. 200, 240 S.E.2d 338 (1977); Highway Commission v. Nuckles, 271 N.C. 1, 155 S.E.2d 772 (1967). It was error to dismiss the appeal. We reverse the order dismissing the appeal and remand to the Court of Appeals for a hearing on the merits.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The interlocutory order of the superior court, from which the plaintiff appealed, affects a substantial right which the plaintiff will lose if the order is not reviewed before final judgment. Waters v. Qualified Personnel, Inc., 294 N.C. 200, 240 S.E.2d 338 (1977); Highway Commission v. Nuckles, 271 N.C. 1, 155 S.E.2d 772 (1967). It was error to dismiss the appeal. We reverse the order dismissing the appeal and remand to the Court of Appeals for a hearing on the merits.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

485 S.E.2d 295, 346 N.C. 274, 1997 N.C. LEXIS 306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunkley-v-shoemate-nc-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack