Dunkin's Donuts of America, Inc. v. Dunkin Donuts, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dunkin's Donuts of America, Inc. v. Dunkin Donuts, Inc.

7 A.D.2d 609, 178 N.Y.S.2d 646, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4702

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 1, 1958

StatusPublished

This text of 7 A.D.2d 609 (Dunkin's Donuts of America, Inc. v. Dunkin Donuts, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dunkin's Donuts of America, Inc. v. Dunkin Donuts, Inc., 7 A.D.2d 609, 178 N.Y.S.2d 646, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4702 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Application for stay denied, with $10 costs. If on appeal there is a reversal or modification of the order in respect to the power of the [610]*610court to direct a cancellation of the appellant corporation’s name in the Secretary of State’s office, which is the only subject upon which the stay is now sought, appropriate direction to the plaintiff-respondent in relation to the corporate name shall be provided in the order. When and until there is a reversal of the right to use the name, no damage to appellants has been demonstrated. Present—Foster, P. J., Bergan, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Application for stay denied, with $10 costs. If on appeal there is a reversal or modification of the order in respect to the power of the [610]*610court to direct a cancellation of the appellant corporation’s name in the Secretary of State’s office, which is the only subject upon which the stay is now sought, appropriate direction to the plaintiff-respondent in relation to the corporate name shall be provided in the order. When and until there is a reversal of the right to use the name, no damage to appellants has been demonstrated. Present—Foster, P. J., Bergan, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 A.D.2d 609, 178 N.Y.S.2d 646, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunkins-donuts-of-america-inc-v-dunkin-donuts-inc-nyappdiv-1958.