Dunkin' Donuts, Inc. v. HWT Associates, Inc.
This text of 181 A.D.2d 711 (Dunkin' Donuts, Inc. v. HWT Associates, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action, inter alia, to recover on a promissory note, David Cohen, the former attorney for the defendant HWT Associates, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Santucci, J.), dated June 11, 1990, which denied his motion pursuant to Judiciary Law § 475 to fix and enforce his attorney’s charging lien.
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements (see, Dunkin’ Donuts v HWT Assocs., 181 AD2d 713 [decided herewith]). Bracken, J. P., Harwood, Lawrence and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
181 A.D.2d 711, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunkin-donuts-inc-v-hwt-associates-inc-nyappdiv-1992.