Dunican v. Conforti

30 Misc. 799, 63 N.Y.S. 467
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedMarch 15, 1900
StatusPublished

This text of 30 Misc. 799 (Dunican v. Conforti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dunican v. Conforti, 30 Misc. 799, 63 N.Y.S. 467 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The record fails to disclose the residences of the defendants. The judgment is therefore reversed and a new trial ordered in the Municipal Court in the district in which the action was brought, without costs. See Tyroler v. Gummersbach, 28 Misc. Rep. 151.

Present: Truax, P. J.; Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tyroler v. Gummersbach
28 Misc. 151 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 Misc. 799, 63 N.Y.S. 467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunican-v-conforti-nyappterm-1900.