Dunham v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Dunham v. State

1911 OK CR 511, 118 P. 1106, 6 Okla. Crim. 686, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 467

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 24, 1911

DocketNo. A-782.

StatusPublished

This text of 1911 OK CR 511 (Dunham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dunham v. State, 1911 OK CR 511, 118 P. 1106, 6 Okla. Crim. 686, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 467 (Okla. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

*687 PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Jack Dunham, was convicted in the county court of Blaine county at the January, 1910, term, on a charge of maintaining a place for the sale of intoxicating liquors, and his punishment fixed at a fine of fifty dollars and imprisonment in the county jail thirty days. No prejudicial error sufficient to justify a reversal of this cause appearing from the record, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*687 PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Jack Dunham, was convicted in the county court of Blaine county at the January, 1910, term, on a charge of maintaining a place for the sale of intoxicating liquors, and his punishment fixed at a fine of fifty dollars and imprisonment in the county jail thirty days. No prejudicial error sufficient to justify a reversal of this cause appearing from the record, the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1911 OK CR 511, 118 P. 1106, 6 Okla. Crim. 686, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunham-v-state-oklacrimapp-1911.