Dunham v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Dunham v. State

1911 OK CR 511, 118 P. 1106, 6 Okla. Crim. 686, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 467

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided November 24, 1911·No. No. A-782.·Published

Opinion

*687 PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Jack Dunham, was convicted in the county court of Blaine county at the January, 1910, term, on a charge of maintaining a place for the sale of intoxicating liquors, and his punishment fixed at a fine of fifty dollars and imprisonment in the county jail thirty days. No prejudicial error sufficient to justify a reversal of this cause appearing from the record, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*687 PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Jack Dunham, was convicted in the county court of Blaine county at the January, 1910, term, on a charge of maintaining a place for the sale of intoxicating liquors, and his punishment fixed at a fine of fifty dollars and imprisonment in the county jail thirty days. No prejudicial error sufficient to justify a reversal of this cause appearing from the record, the judgment is affirmed.

Dunham v. State, 1911 OK CR 511, 118 P. 1106, 6 Okla. Crim. 686, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 467 (Okla. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

1911 OK CR 511 (Dunham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.