Dunham v. State

23 Ill. Ct. Cl. 28, 1959 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 3
Court of Claims of Illinois·Decided March 26, 1959·No. No. 4730·Published

Opinion

Wham, J.

This case involves multiple claims for recovery under Article XVI, Section 11 of the Military and Naval Code of Illinois, Ill. Rev. Stats., (1953 State Bar Association Edition), Chap. 129, Par. 143.

Claimants, Leon Dunham, Leon Brown, Freddie Lewis, Willie Britton, Jr., Bnrton Mosley, Willie L. Walker, and Lester Aaron, deceased, were enlisted men and members of the 178th Regimental Combat Team, Illinois National Guard, assigned for and performing their duties as drivers or relief drivers on a motor convoy of approximately one hundred vehicles returning from their annual summer field training period at Camp Ripley, Minnesota.

Claimants Brown, Walker, and the deceased, Lester Aaron, were each driving trucks, while claimants, Lewis, Britton and Mosley were- relief drivers riding in the trucks.

The convoy departed on July 22, 1954 from Camp Ripley, Minnesota for its home station in Chicago, Illinois. On July 23rd, after spending the night at Camp McCoy, Wisconsin, the convoy proceeded toward Chicago on U. S. Route No. 12. At a point approximately seven miles south of Baraboo, Wisconsin, in dark rainy weather, and on a blacktop highway, the convoy, after negotiating a long incline and a curve at the crest, started downhill. A civilian automobile, passing the convoy on the left, suddenly cut into one of the intervals between the vehicles directly in front of the deceased, Lester Aaron, who immediately applied his brakes. His truck slid out of control, turned over, and resulted in injuries from which he died. Claimants, Willie Britton, Jr., and Burton Mosley were riding in the truck driven by Lester Aaron, and were also injured when the vehicle overturned.

Claimant, Willie Walker, was driving a truck following that driven by Aaron. Upon arriving at the crest of the hill he saw the overturned truck in front of him, and applied his brakes, which caused the truck to overturn, and resulted in injuries to him and to' claimant, Leon Dunham, who was riding in the truck.

Claimant, Leon Brown, was the driver of a third truck. Upon arriving at the crest of the hill, he applied his brakes upon seeing the other trucks overturned, which caused his truck to slide off the road, and come to rest on its side, and resulted in injuries to his person.

Claimant, Freddie Lewis, a relief driver in still another truck, which was being driven by Private First Class Luckie A. Wright, was injured when that truck likewise slid off the road, and turned over on its right-side, when its driver attempted to come to a stop upon arriving at the scene Of the accident.

All of the men involved in the accident were found to be in the line of duty, and were injured or killed while performing their duties as enlisted men in pursuance of orders from their Commander-in-Chief. The occurrence was not a result of wilful neglect or misconduct on the part of claimants. There is no dispute on this point, and admittedly they come within the provisions of the above statute.

In considering the amount of financial help and assistance each claimant is entitled to under the statute, we must consider each separately, and attempt to adjust the same as the merits of each demand.

With respect to claimant, Master Sergeant Leon Dunham, the evidence established that he was 25 years of age, married, and the father of two children. He was employed by the Ford Motor Company, Aircraft Engine Division, as a jet engine mechanic at $2.19 per hour. He was hospitalized from July 23, 1954 through December, 1954, and the injuries he sustained consisted of total blindness of the left eye, and a 10% loss of hearing of the left ear. He also- sustained a basalor skull fracture. He appeared before the Physical Evaluation Board at the Walter Reed Army Hospital on November 23, 1954, and his injuries were found to be permanent. After being released from the hospital, he returned to work at the Ford Aircraft Engine Division as a janitor at $1.74 per hour. On the date of the hearing he was employed at Hallicrafter Radio Engineering at $2.00 per hour, and worked forty hours per week. Claimant testified that he was found by the Evaluation Board to have a 40% disability, and receives $263.00 per month on a 60% disability rating from the Veterans Administration, which he chose rather than retirement benefits from the Army, due to the higher evaluation.

Claimant stated that he lost a total sum of $5,748.00 in wages due to the injuries, but drew $3,400.00 in military pay during that time. He also stated that he received $1,140.00 as a dependence allowance for his wife and children during that period. This claimant also received $41.00 per week for twenty-six weeks, totaling $1,066.00, as well as the sum of $1,000.00 for the loss of the sight of one eye from the John Hancock Insurance Company, which was a group policy, the benefits of which he was entitled to because of his employment with the Ford Motor Company.

In determining the amount claimant is entitled to under the Military and Naval Code of the State of Illinois, it has been the policy of this Court to take into consideration the amount received from the Federal Government as compensation for the same injuries, although such payments under the federal laws pertaining to members of the Armed Forces, including national guardsmen, do not bar a recovery under the Military and Naval Code. Dudley, Et Al, Claimants vs. State of Illinois, Respondent, 21 C.C.R. 255; Roberts, Claimant vs. State of Illinois, Respondent, 21 C.C.R. 406; Sypniewski, Claimant vs. State of Illinois, Respondent, 21 C.C.R. 586.

The test to be applied in these cases is not that of finding damages for like injuries in common law actions. The awards are rather to be made for financial help and assistance as the merits of each case may demand. Oftentimes this Court has used the Workmen’s Compensation Act as a guide in arriving* at an award in cases of this type. In doing so, however, the Court has not considered the Compensation Act to be either a ceiling over or a floor under the awards.

Here the claimant’s earning capacity has unquestionably been affected. Although he is presently earning only nineteen cents less per hour than he earned before the injury, it is common knowledge that the wages of a jet engine mechanic have increased between 1954 and September, 1957, the date of the hearing. Considering the payments received in the hospital and from the group policy, the loss of his wages during his hospitalization has been off-set, and the 60% disability award, which he is receiving from the United States Government, is a substantial one in the amount of $263.00 a month. Taking everything into consideration, we feel that an award of $3,500.00 would be proper.

Claimant, Staff Sergeant Leon Brown, was 25 years of age, single, and employed as a dining servicer at $1.17 per hour prior to the accident. He received a skull fracture, which resulted in diplopia of the right eye, and cuts to his face, which caused scars, and necessitated surgical repair of the right lower eyelid. He was hospitalized from July 23,1954 to March 15,1956. Claimant testified that he sustained a loss of wages during this time in the amount of $4,256.00, and received Army pay in the amount of $1,120.00 during that period, or a net loss of $3,136.00. He also testified that he is receiving benefits under Public Law 108 in the amount of $93.60 per month on a 50% disability rating. He stated that he has difficulty reading.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dunham v. State, 23 Ill. Ct. Cl. 28, 1959 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 3 (Ill. Super. Ct. 1959).

23 Ill. Ct. Cl. 28 (Dunham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.