Dunham v. Macomber

5 Wend. 113
New York Supreme Court·Decided November 22, 1830·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

By the Court,

Sutherland, J.

Whenever the defendant is privileged from imprisonment in a civil action, (he bail are entitled to be discharged. In the case of a defendant who has obtained an insolvent discharge exempting his body from imprisonment, it is of course to discharge the bail. The fact of the suit having been commenced previous to the revised statutes going into operation does not prevent the granting of t his application. The law exempting a female from imprisonment affects the remedy only, and not. (lie rights of the plaintiff; wherefore the saving clause in the repealing act, 3 R. S, 779, § 5, has no application to this question.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dunham v. Macomber, 5 Wend. 113 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1830).

5 Wend. 113 (Dunham v. Macomber) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Aiken v. Richardson
15 Vt. 500 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1843)
Towsey v. Avery
11 Ohio St. 90 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1841)
Reed v. Hobbs
3 Ill. 297 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1840)