Dunham v. Macomber

5 Wend. 113
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 22, 1830
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 5 Wend. 113 (Dunham v. Macomber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dunham v. Macomber, 5 Wend. 113 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1830).

Opinion

By the Court,

Sutherland, J.

Whenever the defendant is privileged from imprisonment in a civil action, (he bail are entitled to be discharged. In the case of a defendant who has obtained an insolvent discharge exempting his body from imprisonment, it is of course to discharge the bail. The fact of the suit having been commenced previous to the revised statutes going into operation does not prevent the granting of t his application. The law exempting a female from imprisonment affects the remedy only, and not. (lie rights of the plaintiff; wherefore the saving clause in the repealing act, 3 R. S, 779, § 5, has no application to this question.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Aiken v. Richardson
15 Vt. 500 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1843)
Towsey v. Avery
11 Ohio St. 90 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1841)
Reed v. Hobbs
3 Ill. 297 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1840)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Wend. 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunham-v-macomber-nysupct-1830.